Posted on May 21, 2012
Click here to see current summaries of all fifty states’ laws in this area.
Large capacity magazines, some of which can hold up to 100 rounds of ammunition, significantly increase a shooter’s ability to injure and kill large numbers of people quickly because they enable the shooter to fire repeatedly without needing to reload. The time required to reload can be critical in enabling victims to escape and law enforcement or others to intervene.
Although the statutory definitions vary, magazines with a capacity of more than 10 rounds of ammunition are generally considered to be “large capacity” magazines. While large capacity magazines are typically associated with semi-automatic assault weapons or machine guns, such devices are generally available for any semi-automatic firearm that accepts a detachable magazine.1
Large capacity ammunition magazines are the common thread uniting all of the high-profile mass shootings in America.2 In Newtown, Connecticut, the shooter equipped his assault weapon with 30-round magazines, which enabled him to fire 154 rounds in less than five minutes.3 The gunman in Tucson in 2011 used a handgun equipped with a 33-round magazine, and was only tackled when he stopped to reload his weapon.4
Large capacity magazines were also used in the assault weapons massacres in Aurora, Columbine, Fort Hood, and at 101 California Street in San Francisco.5 Moreover, the shooter who killed 67 people at a summer camp in Norway in 2011 stated in his written manifesto that he purchased 30-round ammunition magazines via mail order from a dealer in the United States.6
In fact, a review of 62 mass shootings between 1982 and 2012 by Mother Jones found that large capacity ammunition magazines were recovered in 50% of them.7 A review of mass shootings between January 2009 and January 2013 by Mayors Against Illegal Guns found that incidents where assault weapons or large capacity ammunition magazines were used resulted in 135% more people shot and 57% more killed, compared to other mass shootings.8
Large capacity magazines are a relatively new phenomenon. Prior to the 1980s, the most popular handgun design was the revolver, but, during the 1980s, the firearms industry shifted design and marketing toward high-capacity semiautomatic pistols.9 In 1980, semiautomatic pistols accounted for only 32% of the 2.3 million handguns produced in America.10 By 2008, however, such pistols accounted for 76% of the 1.8 million handguns produced that year.11
Bans on large capacity ammunition magazines are often adopted in concert with bans on assault weapons. However, large capacity ammunition magazine bans reduce the capacity, and thus the potential lethality, of any firearm that can accept a large capacity ammunition magazine, including a firearm that is not an assault weapon.12 Crime data also suggests that a ban on large capacity magazines would have a greater impact on gun crime than a ban on assault weapons alone.13
Polling consistently shows that a strong majority of Americans support laws banning large capacity ammunition magazines. In a 2012 survey for CNN, 62% of those polled supported such laws.14
Summary of Federal Law
In 1994, Congress adopted the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, making it unlawful to transfer or possess a “large capacity ammunition feeding device” not lawfully possessed on or before the law’s enactment.15 The law also banned the manufacture, transfer and possession of semi-automatic assault weapons.16 The law was adopted with a sunset clause, however, and expired in 2004, despite overwhelming public support for its renewal. Thus, large capacity ammunition magazines and assault weapons that were formerly banned under the federal law are now legal unless banned by state or local law.
The 1994 Act defined “large capacity ammunition feeding device” as “a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device…that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition.”17 The ban contained a loophole, however, allowing for the continued transfer and possession of large capacity ammunition magazines manufactured or possessed on or before enactment of the law.
Manufacturers took advantage of this loophole in the months leading up to the ban by boosting production of the magazines. As a result, they continued to be readily available – and legal – nationwide, except where specifically banned by state or local law. Additionally, because most magazines do not have any identifying marks to indicate when they were manufactured, it was difficult to distinguish those made before or after the ban.18
Despite these limits, evidence indicates that the federal ban worked to reduce the use of large capacity magazines in crime. A Washington Post study analyzed data kept by the Virginia State Police and found a clear decline in the percentage of crime guns that were equipped with large capacity ammunition magazines after the federal ban was enacted.19 The percentage reached a low of 10% in 2004 and then steadily climbed after Congress allowed the ban to expire; by 2010, the percentage was close to 22%.20
Similarly, since the end of the federal ban, the Los Angeles Police Department has recovered significantly greater numbers of large capacity ammunition magazines, from 38 in 2003 to anywhere from 151 to 940 each year between 2004 and 2010.21
Bans on large capacity ammunition magazines–whether they contain grandfather provisions or not–do not present a problem under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
SUMMARY OF STATE LAWS BANNING LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION MAGAZINES
(This summary was last updated May 31, 2013.)
Eight states and the District of Columbia have enacted laws banning large capacity ammunition magazines: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey and New York. All of these jurisdictions except Colorado also ban assault weapons.
States that ban large capacity magazines designed for use with any firearm
District of Columbia
States that ban large capacity magazines designed for use with handguns only
States that ban large capacity magazines capable of firing more than 10 rounds
District of Columbia
States that ban large capacity magazines capable of firing more than 15 rounds
States that do not grandfather pre-ban magazines
District of Columbia
State that requires registration of grandfathered magazines
State that requires identification markings on large capacity magazines
Description of State Laws Banning Large Capacity Ammunition Magazines
Large capacity ammunition magazine bans can be broken down into the following general categories:
1. States that Ban Large Capacity Magazines for Use with Any Firearm: Seven states (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey and New York) and the District of Columbia all ban large capacity ammunition magazines for use with any firearm.
2. State that Bans Large Capacity Magazines for Use with Handguns Only: Hawaii prohibits the manufacture, transfer and possession of large capacity magazines designed for or capable of use with a handgun.
3. Definition of Large Capacity Magazine: State laws vary as to how the term “large capacity magazine” is defined. California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, and the District of Columbia define a large capacity magazine as a magazine that is capable of firing more than 10 rounds.31 Colorado and New Jersey define a large capacity magazine as a magazine capable of firing more than 15 rounds.
4. Prohibited Activities: Hawaii, New Jersey, and New York have the most comprehensive prohibitions, banning possession, manufacture, and transfer (including sale) of large capacity magazines. New Jersey allows possession of large capacity magazines by a person who has registered a grandfathered assault weapon and uses the magazine in connection with competitive shooting matches sanctioned by the Director of Civilian Marksmanship of the U.S. Department of the Army.32 New York also prohibits the possession of any magazine that is actually holding more than seven rounds, except at a shooting range.
Other states ban various combinations of activities related to large capacity magazines. Colorado, Massachusetts and the District of Columbia ban possession and transfer; California bans manufacture, transfer and importation; and Maryland bans manufacture and transfer. Connecticut bans distribution, importation, purchase, transfer and possession.
5. Magazines Owned at the Time of the Ban: State laws vary in their approach to large capacity magazines already in the possession of private individuals at the time a ban was adopted.
a. States that Do Not Grandfather Pre-Ban Magazines: The District of Columbia, Hawaii,33 New Jersey, and New York do not generally allow for the continued possession of large capacity magazines obtained before these states enacted a ban. As a result, these jurisdictions effectively required any large capacity magazine owned at the time the ban was enacted to be destroyed or transferred to a dealer, law enforcement, or out of state. New York extends a 30-day grace period to any individual in possession of such a magazine manufactured before September 13, 1994 who is unaware that it is illegal. This individual is not required to dispose of the magazine until he or she is notified by law enforcement or county licensing officials that possession is unlawful. Once they receive notice, they have 30 days to surrender or “lawfully dispose” of illegal magazines.
b. States that Grandfather Pre-Ban Magazines: The Connecticut ban does not apply to large capacity magazines that were lawfully possessed before January1, 2014, but lawful owners of such magazines must register them with the State Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection within a specified period. The Colorado ban does not apply to magazines that were lawfully possessed before July 1, 2014, and the Massachusetts ban exempts magazines that were lawfully possessed on September 13, 1994 (the date the federal ban took effect), but neither Colorado nor Massachusetts required the registration of pre-ban magazines. California and Maryland do not prohibit possession of large capacity magazines, although manufacture and transfer are banned. As a result, individuals who possessed such magazines before these states’ bans may continue to possess them.
6. States that Require Identification Markings for Magazines Manufactured after the Law: As noted above, enforcement of laws grandfathering pre-ban magazines is difficult because most magazines do not contain any markings to identify those that were manufactured before or after the effective date of the ban. As a result, the Colorado law requires manufactures to include a permanent stamp or marking on all large capacity magazine produced after July 1, 2013. These markings must indicate that the magazine was manufacture after the date the ban went into effect and must be conspicuously engraved or cast on the outer surface of the magazine.
7. Bans on “Conversion” or “Repair” Kits. In 2013, California explicitly banned the use of “conversion” or “repair” kits that allow the purchaser to construct home-made large capacity ammunition magazines from spare parts.
FEATURES OF COMPREHENSIVE LAW BANNING LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION MAGAZINES
The features listed below are intended to provide a framework from which policy options may be considered and debated. The Law Center has not attempted to include every provision identified in the analysis above, nor have we addressed appropriate exceptions so that the regulation does not produce unintended consequences. A jurisdiction considering modifying existing, or developing new legislation in this area should consult with counsel to ensure its legal sufficiency and compatibility with existing codes and statutes, as appropriate.
- Definition of “large capacity ammunition magazine” includes magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds (Hawaii, California, Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, District of Columbia)
- Ban applies to large capacity ammunition magazines for use with all firearms (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, District of Columbia)
- Prohibited activities include possession, sale, purchase, transfer, loan, pledge, transportation, distribution, importation, and manufacture of large capacity ammunition magazines (Hawaii, New Jersey, and New York are the most comprehensive, banning manufacture, transfer and possession)
- All large capacity magazines manufactured after the adoption of the ban should be identified by distinct and legible markings (Colorado)
- No allowance for pre-ban magazines (District of Columbia, Hawaii, New Jersey, New York); alternatively, if pre-ban magazines are grandfathered, the owner must register them before a specified date (Connecticut)
- “Conversion” or “repair” kits that can be used to build large capacity ammunition magazines from spare parts are prohibited (California)
- Other types of firearms, in contrast, are generally capable of holding far less ammunition. For example, revolvers typically hold six rounds of ammunition in a rotating cylinder. [↩]
- See Violence Policy Center, Mass Shootings in the United States Involving High-Capacity Ammunition Magazines, at http://www.vpc.org/fact_sht/VPCshootinglist.pdf. [↩]
- Mary Ellen Clark & Noreen O’Donnell, Newtown School Gunman Fired 154 Rounds in Less than 5 Minutes, Reuters, Mar. 28, 2013, at http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/28/us-usa-shooting-connecticut-idUSBRE92R0EM20130328. [↩]
- Sam Quinones & Nicole Santa Cruz, Crowd Members Took Gunman Down, L.A. Times, Jan. 9, 2011, at http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jan/09/nation/la-na-arizona-shooting-heroes-20110110. [↩]
- Id. For more information about these tragedies, see Mark Follman, Gavin Aronsen,& Deanna Pan, A Guide to Mass Shootings in America, Mother Jones (July 20, 2012), at http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/07/mass-shootings-map. [↩]
- Stephanie Condon, Norway Massacre Spurs Calls for New U.S. Gun Laws, CBSNews.com (July 28, 2011), at http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20085056-503544.html. [↩]
- Mark Follman et al., More Than Half of Mass Shooters Used Assault Weapons and High-Capacity Magazines, Mother Jones (Feb. 27, 2013), at http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/02/assault-weapons-high-capacity-magazines-mass-shootings-feinstein. [↩]
- For some of the mass shootings included in the analysis, information about the types of firearms and ammunition magazines used remains unknown. Mayors Against Illegal Guns, Analysis of Recent Mass Shootings 1 (Jan. 2013), at http://libcloud.s3.amazonaws.com/9/56/4/1242/analysis-of-recent-mass-shootings.pdf. [↩]
- Violence Policy Center, Backgrounder on Glock 19 Pistol and Ammunition Magazines Used in Attack on Representative Gabrielle Giffords and Others 1 (Jan. 2011), at http://www.vpc.org/fact_sht/AZbackgrounder.pdf. [↩]
- Id. [↩]
- Id. at 2. [↩]
- As of 1994, 21% of civilian-owned handguns and 18% of all civilian-owned firearms were equipped with magazines that could hold 10 or more rounds. Christopher S. Koper, An Updated Assessment of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban: Impacts on Gun Markets and Gun Violence, 1994-2003, Report to the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice 6, 18 (June 2004), at https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/204431.pdf. Assault weapons make up only about 1% of the firearms estimated to be in civilian hands. Bureau of Justice Statistics Selected Findings, U.S. Department of Justice, Firearms, Crime, and Criminal Justice: Guns Used in Crime 6 (July 1995), at http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/GUIC.PDF. [↩]
- In 1994, guns equipped with large capacity magazines were involved in 14% to 26% of gun crimes, while assault weapons were only used in 6%. Koper, supra note 11, at 19. Additionally, a survey of police departments conducted by the Police Executive Research Forum found that “38 percent of the police departments reported noticeable increases in criminals’ use of semiautomatic weapons with high-capacity magazines” since the expiration of the federal ban. Police Executive Research Forum, Guns and Crime: Breaking New Ground by Focusing on the Local Impact 2 (May 2010), at http://policeforum.org/library/critical-issues-in-policing-series/GunsandCrime.pdf. [↩]
- CNN/ORC International Poll, December 17-18 – Gun Rights 3 (Dec. 2012), at http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2012/images/12/19/cnnpoll.december19.4p.pdf. [↩]
- 18 U.S.C. § 922(w)(1), (2). All references to sections of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 921 et seq., are to the sections as they appeared on September 12, 2004. [↩]
- Additional information on assault weapons is contained in the Assault Weapons policy summary. [↩]
- 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(31)(A). However, “attached tubular device[s] designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition” were exempted from the definition. 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(31)(B). [↩]
- Importation of Ammunition Feeding Devices with a Capacity of More Than 10 Rounds, 61 Fed. Reg. 39, 320 (July 29, 1996) (amending 27 C.F.R. § 178.119). [↩]
- About the Project: The Hidden Life of Guns, Wash. Post, Jan. 22, 2011, at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/22/AR2011012204243.html; David S. Fallis & James V. Grimaldi, Virginia Data Show Drop in Criminal Firepower During Assault Gun Ban, Wash. Post, Jan. 23, 2011, at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/22/AR2011012203452.html. [↩]
- Id. [↩]
- Press Release, Citizens Crime Commission of New York City, NYC & LA City Councils Introduce Rezo for Federal Ban on Large Capacity Ammunition Magazines 2 (Mar. 2, 2011), at http://www.nycrimecommission.org/pdfs/CrimeCmsnNYCLACouncils.pdf. [↩]
- Cal. Penal Code §§ 16350, 16740, 16890, 32310-32450. [↩]
- Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 18-12-301, 18-12-303. [↩]
- Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 53-202p, 53-202q. [↩]
- D.C. Code Ann. § 7-2506.01(b). [↩]
- Haw. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 134-8(c). [↩]
- Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 4-305. [↩]
- Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 140, §§ 121, 131M. [↩]
- N.J. Stat. Ann. §§ 2C:39-1(y), 2C:39-3(j), 2C:39-9(h). [↩]
- N.Y. Penal Law §§ 265.00(23), 265.02(8), 265.10, 265.11, 265.20(7-f), 265.36-265.37. [↩]
- A law New York adopted in 2013 would also prohibit the manufacture or sale of any magazine that can hold more than seven rounds, and the possession of any magazine that can hold more than seven rounds if it was obtained after January 15, 2013. However, this law has been suspended and will not go into effect without further legislative action. See 2013 N.Y. ALS 1 § 58, as amended by 2013 N.Y. ALS 57 Part FF § 4. Under the new law, however, New York also prohibits the possession of any magazine that is actually holding more than seven rounds, except at a shooting range. [↩]
- Additional information on New Jersey’s assault weapon ban is contained in our Assault Weapons policy summary. [↩]
- When Hawaii enacted its law in 1992, it allowed individuals in possession of magazines that could accept 20 or fewer rounds to keep them for the following two years. This grandfathering provision expired in July 1, 1994, so individuals in possession of magazines that could accept more than 10 rounds were required to dispose of them before that date. [↩]